Thanks. That does work. I'll close the bug.
Thanks for confirmation ;-)
However, it's rather a pain in the neck to have to a specify a converter
(excuse me, convertor) for all the non-string form fields. A patch to fix
that is attached (should I open another Bugzilla bug?).
It is indeed. And your proposal might be useful for simple cases (string in XML files => form datatype => string in request parameters). But I have an example where I need different convertors in binding and form definition: the binding happens to a file I have no influence on, the date format is dd.mm.yy. But in my application I have yyyy-mm-dd, so I need different convertors. Don't know if it is good to fallback on the form convertor - and have no time to think about it ;-)
What do others think about the proposal?
(Before entering a new bug wait for the reactions on your proposal. If it is not completely rejected, please don't reuse the bug 30351.)
J�rg
