David Crossley wrote: > +1 for the ability to return for subsequent processing. > I like the explicit name "return-no-match". > The default should ideally be true, but does that sit okay > with back-compatibility? > No :) The default should be "false". I'm not a native speaker (obviously) and don't want to be *too* picky, but "return-no-match" sounds a little bit wrong to me. I think something like "return-on-no-match" or so would be better, no?
Carsten
