Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
...
But to be sure, someone should look at the code and verify.
I'm sorry to say that my time constraints have grown even more
strict, as my wife's vet ambulatory opening date is getting nearer
and as we are starting a new metal structure painting section. :-)
If someone wants/has time to do this I'd be happy, but I'm equally
fine in having it only in 2.2.
Is already something checked in into 2.1.x? If so, I think
we should remove it from there - unless of course someone
has time to look at it.
Exactly. If nobody replies in a couple of days I will revert.
Maybe the CGT can foster goodwill? :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
