Torsten Curdt wrote:
The problem is that not necessarily stastus changes are done in one
commit, there is a different granularity in the two. This is the
reason why some projects that were using commit message extraction
systems are now also using a status file.
where is the problem?
do one commit without the magic
words and one with them. not
*all* changes have to go into
the status file.
'k, this is nice :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
