On Sunday 17 October 2004 00:58, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >If there is, it should be worked away.
> Niclas, what's the value of such statements if you don't elaborate a bit? It is a general recommendation. Perhaps an expression of the personal view that cyclic dependencies can always be 'untangled' and solved without it. IMHO, a system that detects cyclic deps are good. If they enforce that they can't be done (like CDI does) then even better. Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.bali.ac / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+
