This sounded to me like they were using Cocoon as an XML data source for
binding to a
Laszlo dataset requiring no integration of the technologies.

While a Laszlo serializer would certainly be interesting I imagine that
recompiling
the SWF for each request would hurt performance.  One of the key
advantages I see in using
RIA technologies like Laszlo is that you get a continuous user interface
without the need
to keep going back to the server to get new pages.  A precompiled SWF
calling back to
Cocoon for XML data would seem to be able to do that today.

Cheers
Adam

-----Original Message-----
From: Luca Garulli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 8 October 2004 3:25 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rich clients in Flash with Cocoon?


Laszlo... watch here:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29237#141539

bye,
Luca Garulli
www.OrienTechnologies.com


On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:10:42 -0800, JD Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I went to make one up.. .but they only wanted to send me a cd for 9 
> bucks - no download :/
> 
> think i will wait and see what develops out of laszlo :)
> 
> JD
> 
> 
> 
> Greg Weinger wrote:
> 
> > Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> >
> >> Rogier Peters wrote:
> >>
> >>> Forgive me for promoting the non-free solution, but I've always 
> >>> thought that Macromedia's own flex[1] is a very nice solution, 
> >>> being java-based and all. For those who don't know, the short is 
> >>> that it takes an xml dialect and renders it to a Flash UI. It 
> >>> should make a nice frontend for cocoon-generated xml. So I'll 
> >>> offer a cigar to the first person who makes a cocoon-forms to 
> >>> macromedia flex serializer.
> >>>
> >>> [1]http://www.macromedia.com/software/flex/solutions/developers/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> there are those (like macromedia founder marc canter) who think 
> >> flex is a laszlo rip-off...
> >
> >
> > Can anyone give me a quick comparison of the feature sets of flex 
> > and laszlo?  We've been exploring flex because of its rich animation

> > features.
> >
> >
> 
>

Reply via email to