On 18 Oct 2004, at 17:03, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
A lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304.jar D lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.0.jar
Why does the 2.1 branch require a timestamped/snapshot version of Xalan, if everything is so fine and dandy with it?
Damn, I am *NOT*. I missed that. We must not depend on timestamped jars for such important dependencies.
Antonio?
Antonio told me about this at the GT: the current Xalan has a big bug when you want to output doctypes as it "forgets" the space between public ID and system ID.
This unreleased Xalan is the same he commited into Forrest and that successfully fixed the aforementioned bug.
The serializers in XALAN are just _VERY_ broken... Why don't we switch the default to work on the serializers block? At least it's a simple-enough code that we can't fix without too much hassle.
Pier
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
