<snip/>Le 22 oct. 04, � 12:23, David Crossley a �crit :
What's needed IMHO is the "big bag of docs with powerful search functions" that we talked about before (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106586497031048&w=2 for example).
If we agree on this, the next step would be to evaluate Forrest against our needs and find out the simplest thing that would work. Maybe Forrest using a live SVN repository, live Lucene indexing and mod_cache in front would be all what we need?
Although I agree completely that it's the accessability, not the quality of the documentation that is lacking, i can't help but hearing echoes of the GT cms-shootout ( bag of docs; heavy on search ).
Why use forrest and not daisy or hippo?
Rogier
