On 10.11.2004 21:04, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-10 16:09 ------- I'm in favour of:
2. Revert the jar and live with the bug in 2.1.x.
Because this bug was already present in 2.1.5, it can live in 2.1.6 as well. Those who need this bug fixed can easily upgrade this library on their own. We should do our best to provide JDK1.3 support at this moment, and after 2.1.6 we can discuss option of dropping it.
Me too.
??
Means +1 and refers to Vadim's "I'm in favour of 2." :-)
Joerg
