Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Really cool would it be if one could work on Java DOM trees with E4X > and/or if one could send E4X objects to the pipeline and serialize them > as SAX.
As it was already pointed out that does not work without excesive serialization/desriazlization due to the nature of xmlbeans 1.x. In principle xmlbeans 2.0 would support DOM directly but the current xmlbeans development is far from a stable version.
As far the stability/cavites in the implementation, then searching https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/query.cgi with product=Rhino and componnet=E4X should give the list of currently open E4X issues in Rhino:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Rhino&component=E4X&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailtype2=exact&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Bug+Number&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
Regards, Igor
