Upayavira wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Okay. My request was more to do with "have I run Forrest right". I
should have made that more clear.
There are two aspects.
* The person who ran the 'forrest' command
would have seen the "Build Successful" note.
* Any of us can review Upayavira's staging site
to see if it "looks okay".
For the latter, i just glanced at a few pages
and it seems to be fine. I see from the dates
in the footers, that you updated both the
"top-level" site docs and the "2.1" docs ... good.
Great. But, as you said elsewhere, I need to use Cocoon's 'build docs',
rather than 'forrest site', as Cocoon needs to prepare some source files
for Forrest.
Yes. The jars.xml and the generated component documentation
which is integrated with the Userdocs.
I did eventually see "Build successful" from Forrest, after having
worked through a few validation issues.
Thanks for checking this.
Anything that can help keep our docs more up-to-date.
--David
