Miles Elam wrote:
On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:46 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Proposed URI syntax:
script:myMethod(param1, param2, param3)
Yes! Much clearer, and it fits well with the existing schema. Still has an issue with escaping commas from the parameters if you're passing values from the sitemap matcher. Perhaps that could be seen as a sane matcher parameter issue?
script:myMethod("{1}", "{2}");
That way you're covered. And right now, I think that's the only way to do it. But, you do get into comma/quote hell somewhat. Otherwise, you want sitemap variables to be available to the source that is resolving the URL, and I can't think immediately of how to do that.
Regards, Upayavira
I'm still unclear on how to hook into flow from here. Are the default flow objects (cocoon, continuation, etc.) passed on script initialization? I would imagine so since the request and continuation values by definition have to be unique for each client request. So where does this variable injection occur? Behind the scenes in the flow interpreter itself or further up the chain closer to the flow function caller?
- Miles Elam
