Leszek Gawron wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
<snip/>
Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is Java 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 2.1.x by default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC not is contained in 1.3.
Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported when it reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick enough :-) )
Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
I see, sorry for the mess.
No probs. That's what the rest of us are here for!
Should I disable the block build by default ?
Erm. In trunk, I would leave it enabled. After all, it is just another unstable block.
I mean 2.1.x
Disable it in 2.1.x.
/Daniel
