Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 6 déc. 04, à 15:41, Glen Ezkovich a écrit :
On Dec 6, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 6 déc. 04, à 15:07, Vadim Gritsenko a écrit :
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
IIRC we aggreed that we like the current syntax of JXTemplate. Exception: We deprecate the #{} notation in favour of ${xpath:....}.
If nobody said this already (I have 150 or so mails to go ...), more than one EL per template is clear FS to me. I'd be in favor of specifying EL at the TemplateGenerator declaration time, and would not go more granular than this...
+1, it might be good to have pluggable languages but run-time switching is definitely FS - and confusing as well.
Thank you. Think this approach is applicable to the tag vs. attribute debate?
Sure. Having mixed languages or mixed tag/attributes templating mechanisms in the same template sounds equally confusing.
What about being able to mix Groovy's XML sytax with the the ordinary one, wouldn't that be nice ;)
/Daniel
