On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:45:27 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the past we had several arguments about why logkit is better and so on but I think most of these arguments are not valid any more.
Well, AFAIU a big one still stands true: security. I really hate the
idea that other code can write to my channel just by doing a
Logger.getLoggerFor().
That goes away with classloading isolation.
But hey, that's life... all in all syslogd has
been around for quite some time and works exactly that way, so let's
move on.
Agreed.
I tend to back the UGLI logging interface ATM...
Yeah, I think Nicola has good points. I also love the fact that UGLI doesn't mess with the classloader, making it easier for us to implement classloading isolation down the road.
but I just love Torsten's just4log suggestion as well. Yeah, something I'm still missing is the good old -DDEBUG swistch...
I'm +0 on this.
-- Stefano.
