Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > Instruction Access > ================== > > What objects should instructions and macros be able to access? Curently > for the needs of the JXTG instructions, the instructions has access to a > ExpressionContext that contains the FOM "view" that is available in > expressions in JXTG. They also have access to an ExecutionContext that > currently contains a script manager and a map with macros, we might need > a SourceResolver also. There are also some other stuff that not are > relevant for the current discussion. > > The questions are: > > * Should the ExecutionContext also contain a ServiceManager? > > * Should the ExpressionContext also contain a ServiceManager? (makes the > ServiceManager available in expressions) > > IMO the ExecutionContext should have access to the ServiceManager and > the ExpressionContext shouldn't. > WDYT? > > Both the above question might be suitable for votes, but I think they > need more discussion about them before we do that. >
-1 if we can pass dom (perhaps bean too) with pipeline parameter (see my answer to stefano). +1 otherwise. What about starting defining a functionnal macros API, so that cforms could plug properly in jx ? > /Daniel
