I posted the following a couple of days ago on the users list. I've discovered a wee bit more information (see below). Anyway, the problem (I'm using Cocoon 2.1.6):
On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Mark Lundquist wrote:
Hi, I'm having trouble figuring out this problem...
I have a flowscript that displays a form using form.showForm(), does its thing, and calls cocoon.sendForm().
The Problem:
If I submit an invalid form, the request invoked by sendForm() gives me "No pipeline matched request."! This is the same request that was processed the first time through to display the form, but for some reason it misses in the sitemap the second time when the form is being redisplayed!
If I submit a valid form, then I get the same "No pipeline matched request" for the final sendPage() of the flowscript. So, it's like internal redirects after the continuation is resumed are broken, or something.
The flowscript is being called from a subsitemap, if that matters.
I set sitemap logging to DEBUG, but that didn't turn up any clues. Obviously it's something I'm doing, because forms+flow in a subsitemap work just fine in the samples... BTW this application worked w/ Cocoon 2.1.5... but I might have made a few other changes since porting it to 2.1.6, before I became aware of this problem.
Any ideas where I might look to try and debug this? Thanks a lot! —ml—
This morning I modified o.a.c.matching.AbstractPreparableMatcher to log failed matches, and I can see that it's trying to match the request in the _root_ sitemap, not in the subsitemap. BTW, right before sitemap processing I see this:
DEBUG (2005-01-29) 08:41.31:245 [sitemap] (/newsletters/7e403a2a6b8f557450733b7d1c6d2f417b241c1f.continue) PoolThread-4/EnvironmentWrapper: Setting uri (prefix=null, uris=subscription-no-id-form.old.standard)
Since the prefix is null, we should process in the current context, right? And you can see that the URI doesn't start w/ "/" (remember, we're down in the showForm() validation loop, and this is the same URI that matched successfully the first time the form was displayed in the same flow...
Any ideas? thanks, Mark
