This makes me a little uncomfortable. So blocks will now have a release
schedule that is independent from core? I'm just wondering if that is a
good thing or a bad thing at this time. And if that is so, why isn't
each block on its own release? (That is just rhetorical, as I don't
believe we are ready for that - but we will be when "real" blocks emerge.)
Ralph
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It seems that we all agree more or less on moving the blocks out of the
core, so which directory structure do we want to use in svn?
We recently had this suggestion:
/cocoon/trunk
/cocoon/blocks/core/
/cocoon/blocks/supported/
/cocoon/blocks/unsupported/
And then under core, supported, unsupported, come the different blocks
with a trunk, tags, releases directory each, right?
I think the first step is easy, we could move the blocks to the new
directory structure and then use svn:external to link the blocks into
the core, so nothing really changes but we are one step further.
Carsten
