On Dom, 20 de Marzo de 2005, 4:01, Sylvain Wallez dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > >>Hi: >> >>This is the recent article that shows rhino is doing well: >> >>http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2005/jw-0314-scripting_p.html >> >> > > That's good news, but don't forget that our Rhino version (i.e. the one > that will ship with 2.1.7) is a fork of a very old version. So we do not > benefit from the increased performance of the new version.
What I wanted to show, is that even our old rhino is doing well (the 2nd faster), if we compare it with other scriping languages: "Figure 1 that lists results for the most time-consuming task: comparing 1 million integers for equality." http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2005/images/jw-0314-scripting1.jpg IMHO, 8 seconds for 1M comparisions is a good performance compared with the job a tipical flow script acting as cocoon controller needs to do. How many time it can spend. Can we still said that Rhino is a bottleneck. ;-) Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
