beatejung wrote:
hi, i really agree with jeremy ... maybe my opinion is not so important here because i do not made too many experiences with cocoon yet, but i really like the parameters with
<map:call function="handleForm"> ...
it is nice to use wild cards * and {1} and so on in the pipeline to create the filenames and other pilelines i need. i like the flexibility i get.
in some cases i was so keen and added some other parameters just for my own purposes like
<map:match pattern="form3-*-*.flow">
....
<map:parameter name="templateURI" value="form3-d-pipeline-{1}-{2}"/>
<map:parameter name="successURI" value="form3-s-pipeline"/>
....
You can access any parameter you want in the flowscript using "cocoon.parameter.blah", so you do not really /need/ the handleForm function. But we can consider keeping it (with more consistent names) as a convenience for a common need.
Sylvain
-- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://apache.org/~sylvain http://anyware-tech.com Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director
