Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005 10:26 AM, Daniel Fagerstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 31 Mar 2005, at 01:26, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
<snip/>
As all URI discussions tend to provoke strong feelings for Stefano, it's
best to say directly that this question is not important enough for me
to fight about ;)
But anyway, whether we go for an opaque custom protocol or base the
block protocol on hierachial URIs we need to get into the specifics for
the block URI scheme to be able to implement it.
WDYT?
He, he... The more I look at this the more I wonder if maybe it
really isn't crazy to allow blocks to specify a resolver intercept
scheme. Just lift the code directly out of mod-rewrite/mod-redirect
and let a block tell Cocoon what URI's have special concerns:
<resolver>match spec</resolver>
then you can go either way...
I'm not following you, we already has source factories, so we can make
our resolver as special as we want to. The question was rather if we
should make them less special by using java.net.URI. Or do you have
something else in mind?
/Daniel
