Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
It can be <map:components> <map:generators> <map:virtual name="a">
That's enough information to build it.
I still like the way we agreed in the past and Daniel implemented, the fact that a generator is a java class or is a subpipeline should not make any difference in the semantics.
You mean - with explicit specification of the class name? I'm fine with it too - that's how I prototyped it in the first place... But folks here have desire for some syntax sugar, IIUC.
Vadim
