Ralph Goers wrote:
Question. What else is in a block that requires that COB-INF exist at all? Why can't it just be:
[cocoon block] [DIR]
+--block.xml
+--classes [DIR]
+--lib [DIR]
Ralph
IMO its as usefull/useless as WEB-INF for web archives.
Presumably the case for putting such stuff in COB-INF is that it will not be accessible via a sitemap, and thus increases security a bit? That presumably is the argument behind WEB-INF.
Regards, Upayavira
