Geoff Howard wrote:
On Apr 12, 2005 2:33 AM, Reinhard Poetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Is posible to change the name from:
block.xml -> cob.xml
ATM everything is possible ;-)
I see the analogy to WEB-INF/ --> web.xml.
IMHO this is to keep the same name and avoid confusions. ;-)
WDYT?
fine for me too, so we have
--------------------------------------------------------------
[cocoon block] [DIR]
+-- COB-INF [DIR]
+-- cob.xml
+-- classes [DIR]
+-- lib [DIR]
--------------------------------------------------------------
WDOT?
I don't think the inconsistency (COB-INF -> block.xml) is a big deal.
There is also a META-INF and it does not have a meta.xml in it.
In fact, it would have the added benefit of helping people guess what
the heck a "COB" is if they are just browsing around the FS. I think
this argument was made before.
agreed. I like block.xml better.
--
Stefano.
