On Jue, 14 de Abril de 2005, 9:42, Carsten Ziegeler dijo: > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >> >> >> Isn't session-fw deprecated? >> >> > No, not yet :) > >> >> I think Torsten meant to move classes into session-fw because of hard >> (compilation time) dependency, while *not* adding session-fw -> xsp >> dependency, >> which is soft (configuration only). >> > Yeah, but that's imho very ugly. But to be honest, I'm tired of these > xsp and dependency discussions. If someone things it should be > different, do it if you think that it helps our users.
What about creating mocks for the session-fw dependencies in XSP? Perhaps not the cleaner solution, but a practical one.;-) WDYT? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
