>>> IMO status.xml and the svn logs serve different purpose. >> >> seriously? ...are the commit message much different > >> from what is in the status.xml? I don't think so. > > ... > > >> ...I am always a big fan of as little maintenance as possible :) Of >> course it *does* require some discipline on the commit messages. > > > Why not just do it the other way around? Formulate the status.xml > entry such that it can be pasted as is into the commit message.
...well, I think that's how most people do it right now - but that's not the same. You still need to make sure not to forget to change the status xml. It's just an additional step that. > If input from a non-committer was used, mention his/her name (as is > already common practice today). I think it's futile to try anything > more elaborate to have a fair appreciation of the importance of each > individual contribution. Sure cheers -- Torsten
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
