Sebastien Arbogast wrote:
Don't forget a patch can be a complete replacement of an existing
solution/document.


It CAN be ! ;-) BTW your article is really excellent. Maybe we should apply this "lazy
consensus" thing, WDYT ?



It already applies here. Where do you think I learnt it ;-)

It is the conspet of lazy consensus Upayavira was referring to.

You can read more at http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus and http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html (see "Consensus Gauging through Silence" at the bottom of the page)

Ross




Reply via email to