Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
For our current situation I think we could release a 2.2.0 right
away. It doesn't contain what we planned for but OTH it contains a
lot of goodies that we didin't plan for and that should be usefull
for a larger audience.
Disagree.
First, I want to see Cocoon Forms marked stable, even if the next
release is 2.1.8, IMO that has got to happen.
We all want to see Cocoon Forms marked stable. But most of us, I for
example, don't do anything to make it happen.
And I go into the bad behavior of adding new features...
Second, has anybody stress tested trunk? Or documented what
incompatibilities have been introduced? Or even what features it
provides?
Don't know. Reinhard and maybe Sylvain at least seem to use it for
customer systems maybe there are more.
I use 2.2 for some prototypes, but not for customer projects.
Heck, if someone asked me what the benefit of the current trunk is
over the 2.1.X branch I don't think I could tell them. I know the
core has changed a lot....
This is the most popular reference:
http://www.anyware-tech.com/blogs/sylvain/archives/000171.html
That was to outline all of the hidden gems that were flourishing in trunk...
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://apache.org/~sylvain http://anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director
