Leszek Gawron wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:Leszek Gawron wrote:Reinhard Poetz wrote:
<snip/>
AFAIR due to the fact that resource:/ protocol is not as functional as file:/ (no directiories?) and it would be quite intensive operation to find .xconf files.It's a pity we cannot move .xconf files into jars.Why can't we?
Carsten made the resource: protocol traversable a couple of months ago. /Daniel
