Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Le 11 juin 05, � 11:30, Carsten Ziegeler a �crit : > >>...Ok, so we should decide if we want to support more than one flow >>language per sitemap, first... > > > Is there a need for this? It might lead to some confusion, and IIUC > there's always the workaround of using several sitemaps if someone > needs several flow languages simultaneously. > I honestly don't know. The problem I see is that you are allowed to define several scripts with different languages per sitemap, but the map:call addresses always the last map:flow node.
> So I'm not sure if it's worth the effort (but I don't know how big the > effort is ;-) > I think fixing this is very easy, just a few minor changes and that's it. The other solution is to allow only one map:flow node per sitemap. But I think we should do one or the other. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
