Reinhard Poetz wrote:
2-Should we want to encourage people to write Javaflow instead of
JSFlow?
no, I think offering both options is enough. People can decide
themselves.
Actually, I think we need a third option, but I don't know what it is.
I've heard the desire to have something that is like the sitemap in that
is a "configuration file" (i.e. it is XML) but is more programmable. I
suppose something like Jelly, although I doubt I'd ever recommend using
Jelly itself. Basically its as if they want the sitemap, but with the
ability to stick if/else, for, while, etc. statements in it and be able
to call Java business methods from it.
Ralph
- Re: Sitemap: flow and interpreters Ralph Goers
-
