On Jun 21, 2005, at 8:41 AM, Mark Lundquist wrote:
On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:42 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
BTW, why do you prefer v2 rather than v1?
<..schnip!..>
One thing I don't care so much for in v2 is the idiom of attaching view
data as properties of the widget tree root. The minimalist approach
(losing 'bizData') was clever, but in actual practice I find that I
really like having one locus of transfer of data between the flowscript
and the presentation, so I usually end up with something like this
anyway:
w.viewData =
{
schtuff: foobar,
etc: otherStuff
};
form.showForm ('whatev');
...and so I guess I'd rather have it as an explicit parameter (and also
not needing to have 'viewData.' at the head of the expression path
within the JX template).
While on the subject... since I am "Mr. Anal Nomenclature Pants", I
would vote for changing 'bizData' to 'viewData' (as in v3)... a much
better name IMHO :-)
cheers,
—ml—
