On Jun 24, 2005, at 9:23 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Hey All,
Lazy vote here on the subject of adding getSitemapURIPrefix method
to the Request interface. Details are in the bug mentioned below.
+1
And as eveybody comments on the name, I like it as it is explicit.
We have so many pathes and prefixes around in Cocoon :-)
I like the explicitness as well but I was just wondering if there is
a need to be so explicit here. Given a sitemap location a/b and a
request URI of a/b/c/d
would any one expect to get a/b/c as the URI prefix for a/b/c/e? If
the answer is yes, then do we need a getCompleteURIPrefix so that we
could move files around inside a sitemap's directory structure as well?
I've been accused of being to explicit in my naming and I'm working
on finding some middle ground. :-)
Glen Ezkovich
HardBop Consulting
glen at hard-bop.com
A Proverb for Paranoids:
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to
worry about answers."
- Thomas Pynchon Gravity's Rainbow
Glen Ezkovich
HardBop Consulting
glen at hard-bop.com
A Proverb for Paranoids:
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to
worry about answers."
- Thomas Pynchon Gravity's Rainbow
