Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >> >>IMHO, wording "create-document" implies that (probably persistent) >>document is being created somewhere, which is then fed into the pipeline. >> >>"null", on the other hand, is closer to the meaning of what source >>actually does. If "null" seems inappropriate, it can be named "empty", >>which imho is the best name for it: >> >> empty: >> empty:root-element >> >> >>WDYT?... > > > > +1. "empty" is clearer about this source's intent. > Actually I don't really care what we name it, although I think that a document that has a root element is not really empty :) But let's not argue about that, if you think that 'empty' is a better name, just go ahead a change it.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
