Daniel Fagerstrom schrieb: > > At some point in time, e.g. now ;) we need to decide that we go for > OSGi. Keeping all roads open at all time means that we just reinvent > whats allready is standardized in OSGi. > > For functionality that we allready have, we must of course respect back > compability and write wrappers beween what we have and the new OSGi > based implementations. But for new functionallity I think that we should > reuse as much as possible of what allready is in OSGi. > > I think we should use OSGi *just* for the "core blocks" implementation which is class loading, versioning and installation and that's it. But that's just my opinion.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
