On 8/31/05, Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30 Aug 2005, at 19:06, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Ralph Goers wrote:
<snip/> > > So, even if cforms are still unstable, frankly, 2.1.8 shouldn't be > blocked by it at all... > > Or am I the only one seeing it this way? No: Cocoon is far far more than cforms. cforms is a presentation layer on a system that should be presentation layer independant, so IMO it would not be justifiable in any way to try and couple the release of Cocoon to the stability of cforms. I'd spend the effort to move us to 2.1.8 just to get a look at the new Cocoon stack trace stuff. -- Peter Hunsberger
