Andrew Savory wrote: > > Sounds good ... the problem we have currently with "ship it when it's > ready" is we rarely agree on when it is ready ;-) The only thing I'm > wondering about is if every two months isn't a little fast for the > current rate of change in the 2.1* series? > Yeah, might be - let's just start with two months and see if it works, we can extend it to three months later on. But we shouldn't take a longer period imho.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
