Guys,
I've created a "Live Sites" set of pages in Daisy:
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/695.html
I've also reworked two entries in Bugzilla to be included as planned:
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/695/702.html
I left out the info on how to check if it's actually Cocoon, since it
was my intention to use that only as a "requirement" for being added to
the list, not publicly available information.
For the case you need a list of the bugs with the links to be added I
still have them -
I've been searching in bugzilla and Jira (as a test) to find those
actually entered, but it would be great if you could go over them once
again and add the info to Daisy.
We started to let people provide more information about their websites,
maybe something like "success stories" or at least additional infos (see
the bottom of the livesites page). This was the reason why we switched
to bugzilla while before that change the requests to be added to
livesites went just over the Cocoon users mailing list. I will be
disappointed if we now sent these additional info just to nirvana. With
our Daisy would it not even possible to add one additional page for each
livesite (that provided that additional info).
No no, it was never my intention to send the info to /dev/null. My idea
was something along the lines of:
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/695/702.html
However, since I was no committer at the time (and I'm still not sure if
I could do the proper check to see if a site is actually built with
Cocoon), I hoped someone would pick this up. OTOH: if the info is in
bugzilla the page could be reworked at one point in time and the info
added then.
For now, I assume that actual appearance in the list is more important
(pending the auto-export of Daisy into the official site) than adding
the full content of the bugzilla entry.
See the original bug description and comments to bug #32266 [1], where
we started with it. *grml* Somebody *has* changed the original bug
:-) I noticed earlier on and had the same feeling.
though the bottom of livesites page explicitely mentions to not do it
this way.
[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32266
What I'm currently left with is:
- does the page look clear enough as it is now?
(http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/695/702.html)
- Is the separation per release worthwhile? It is when there are a lot
of verbose entries per release, but if there are only a few sites per
release, a few on the same page is propably easier to navigate.
- I propose to move all entries that have to do with the same release,
whether 2.1.X-dev or 2.1.X (release) to the same page, like:
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/695/697.html
otherwise the list of releases gets very cluttered.
- what should we do with links that return errors? I.e. e.g. a Tomcat
error or a plain 404?
Sorry I couldn't add more sites, running out of time.
HTH.
Bye, Helma
