Le 26 sept. 05, à 13:45, Daniel Fagerstrom a écrit :
...My rambling about releases sime time ago http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=111675871100002&r=1&w=2 inspired Reinhard to stop using Bugzilla for planning http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=111676672214067&w=2. So as I'm going to start using Bugzilla for planning it seemed appropriate to say something about my view of planning, and to discuss how to plan in an efficient way if anybody felt like it...
I'm all for handling more issues in bugzilla (or Jira? might be a good time to switch if you're going to put lots of useful stuff there, after a vote of course), but our history shows that planning usually does not work.
So I'm +1 to accumulate information in the issue tracker - as you say, if you've analyzed a problem or found a partial solution, having it all on one page helps a lot.
But I don't think we should put big efforts into organizing the issues, having well-specified issues that stand for themselves (with links between them as appropriate, of course) seems good enough to me.
-Bertrand
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
