Upayavira wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
If there is interest we could move the zip source out of the
scratchpad
into the core, officially adding it to 2.1.x. What do others think?
good idea.
Also the CachedSource is a candiate.
Anyway, +0 for both (as I can't do it myself)
+1 (i can), only question is, is there any particular reason zip:
source syntax is so different from jar: syntax? Can someone please
recall? :)
Yup. Add to this the fact that having the entry name _before_ the zip
archive doesn't look nice.
[1] http://docs.sun.com/source/819-0913/author/jar.html#jarprotocol
+1 for zipsource in 2.1 with the jar url syntax
I want to see a zip source, because its name says what it does. Yes,
jar protocol can do the same thing, but it isn't obvious, and would
give the impression to others that Cocoon can't handle zip files,
until they find out that they can use the jar protocol.
The main difference between the zip source and the built-in jar
protocol, is that the path to the archive is a Cocoon source itself.
That means that we can write (new syntax)
"zip://context://path/to.zip!/path/to/entry.xml", or even more
interesting for CMS applications, assuming a OO file has been uploaded
using the "file" input, "zip://upload://file!/document.xml".
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://people.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director
