Reinhard Poetz wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >>>Hm :-) Are you sure it will be better than SitemapConfigurable? :-) >>> >> >>No :) Ok, for example we could have properties file next to the sitemap >>and these properties are available as global variables for this sitemap >>and all sub sitemaps. This might be a little bit cleaner. Don't no. > > > Maybe I miss the point completly as I haven't followed this thread in detail, > but aren't block properties (declared in block.xml and set in wiring.xml) > enough? > Yes, gosh, you're right - the only question is, do we want to go this way and do this incompatible changes (means: removing the sitemap component configurations from the sitemap)?
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
