Upayavira wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 11 Oct 2005, at 20:16, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 11 oct. 05, à 07:31, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
...- Cocoon 2.2 will not use OSGi but will support blocks as far
as possible:...
...- Cocoon 3.0 will use OSGi --> shielding classloader and hot
plugablillity...
...WDOT?
+1 to the plan.
Just one small nitpicking comment, we should say "3.0 will *most
probably* use OSGI" - as you said, it's a nice goal to have but I
don't think we're 100% positive on that yet, there are still a few
unknowns.
I agree wholeheartedly... I am not 100% sure that OSGI is the
perfect solution. AFAICS it's a little bit too cumbersome for my
brain.
And I know a lot of others share my concerns (from discussions at
the GT).
Pier
Any specific concerns about OSGi?
For me, licensing. As for technical matters, I stopped caring when we
killed Avalon.
We can't ship until a OSGi R4 implementation is available, which means
probably waiting for Felix to finish the implementation *and* exit
incubation. That might take some time.
Or use Eclipse, which is R4 already, and then switch to Felix when it
matures sufficiently.
Ah! didn't know that. Good, I'm happy then.
--
Stefano.
