Bruno Dumon wrote:
> However, why not include the HTML generated by Ross' effort?
>
> In my opinion, the [organisation of the] current 'legacy' documentation
> better fits into the normal site-rendering as provided by forrest (or
> the online Daisy Wiki). It will also be more familiar for the users,
> 2.1.8 is a patch release after all.
Given the current time pressure of the upcoming release date and the fact that both versions have their highlights and drawbacks, I suppose we should go with the one that currently gives the best user experience and re-evaluate our decision later.
I'm not saying anything for or against either one of them, you guys should better decide amongst yourself.
BTW. I will not be contributing to Daisy over the coming week, so before you're exporting HTML please check if there are some unpublished versions of documents edited by doc-editors (contributers that are not committers).
Bye, Helma
