Ralph Goers wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
<snip/>
Activating this second feature requires to change the XSLTProcessor
implementation to o.a.c.c.xslt.XSLTProcessorImpl
Damn! While porting to the 2.1 branch, I realized that this conflict
with the same class that exists in the "deprecated" block.
What do you think: is it better to remove the old XSLTProcessorImpl,
or rename the new class? I like simple and straightforward names for
default implementations...
Follow the versioning contract. Assuming you can find it.
Uh? Versioning contract?
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://people.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director
