Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >>Yes, I think we should go through all these attributes and see/vote >>which ones can be made dynamic. > > > IIRC, this vote was already done at Cocoon 2.0 times. Substitution for > component > types etc was prohibited on the basis that it makes it easier to implement > "dynamic pipelines". > Yeah, I know - and that's absolutely ok for component types. But what about mime-type, or the some others Marc listed?
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
