hepabolu wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
<thinking out loud>
I think, to make things future-proof, we need a flexible metadata
part, much like the bookmetadata part, where metadata key/value pairs
can be added, rather than a set number of fields which accommodate
for the current distinctions (category and version).
The approach I use here for our documentation system is to have a
multi-valued field that any user can use to tag a document. I also
have a set of collections that are the "official" classifications.
Right, but then you have a predefined selection list with available
values for the field.
Not quite. You have a predefined selection list for the managed
collections, but a free form multivalued field for the tags. Best of
both worlds, users get free form tagging, editors get close control over
the structure of the document set.
Ross