On 04.11.2005 02:09, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Yep. The "." and "/" are already checked in AbstractWidgetDefinition.setCommonProperties(). We just need to add ":".Why we need to use a symbol at any cost ? Can we use a simple word prefix? As cform-[widgetID]?
If you prefix the widget id with a simple word (your proposal) or suffix it with another one (Sylvain's way), with both you have to care about the validness of user-chosen ids. To check them easily you use the unique separator.
Jörg
