Il giorno 05/nov/05, alle ore 08:46, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto:
So let's make other proposals. Let's consider wiget
"foo.bar" (e.g. a fd:field in a fd:group) and the ID of its <input>.
- "foo.bar..input": the '.' is doubled, which can never conflict
with a widget's full name
- "foo.bar._input": generated element's name starts with a
character that we can forbid as the first character of widget names
I prefer the first one (double '.') which is IMO more readable
than the second.
Another one, which looks more natural: "foo.bar.input.": the
trailing '.' ensures it cannot conflict with a widget's full name
The fact that it is not that readable might be a plus. The problem
with double dots or a dot at the end is that it's easy to miss when
reading the code. an extra '_' sticks out more and won't be missed as
easily.
Ugo
