Torsten Curdt wrote: > > On 08.11.2005, at 23:53, David Crossley wrote: > >> Torsten Curdt wrote: >> >>>>>> It is a shame, but these samples never got over the loss on the xml >>>>>> docs that used to be distributed with Cocoon. >>>>>> These were what were indexed for those samples AFAIR. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Remove them? >>>> >>>> >>>> Erk, that is bad. How about just leaving them there, >>>> knowing that they are broken, with a notice on the Lucene >>>> Samples page. Someone might be able to later add a >>>> specific set of example docs. >>> >>> >>> Erk, that is even worse ;-) >>> >>> Seriously: releasing with a broken sample >>> does not really spread confidence in a >>> product. >> >> >> :-) >> >> I believe that throwing the work away, just because >> no-one can find a bit of time to fix it, is a >> community destroyer. Why would people bother to >> contribute examples when the work gets thrown away >> so easily. > > > We have a SCM ...nothing gets thrown away. > Just not included in the release. At least > to me that's the better option. But anyway. > > Best would be of course to just fix it ;)
Or we could leave the sample there but remove it from the menu. Can't see it but don't remove the code. Regards, Upayavira
