sorry for duplicating Ross' effort. I only know understand what he meant
by "removing the documentation name is not the solution".
I now also realise what happened and what the rationale was behind the
way it is currently set up in Daisy:
the main menu bar suggests that there are sub sections: About,
Documentation, Community etc. I wanted to keep that division so I
created the "folders" About, Documentation, Community etc. I focused
more on the appearance of the menu on the left than on the urls. When
there was a discrepancy, I choose the menu above the url.
So, I can either remove the "headers" like About and Documentation and
they have to be added in the daisy-to-forrest conversion, or we have to
settle for a slightly adjusted url space.
When removing the xdocs from the repository I left the original book.xml
and other relative files in for reference of these headers.
So from my POV there is an inconsistency between what the menu suggest
and the urls reflect in the ORIGINAL site. I have tried to fix that in
the Daisy documentation.
I never realised that people pay more attention to urls than to the
menu. Sorry for that and sorry for not communicating all these ideas and
decisions.
Bye, Helma
- Re: [DOCS] Building for release - update hepabolu
-